Q: Why is each component scored on 3.0 scale when the final grade
is on 4.0 scale?
A: A 3.0 scale was chosen to score each component because it's relatively simple
to use. Most people can distinguish between excellent and poor. Excellent scores
a 3 and poor scores a 1. When in doubt or if neither extreme is appropriate,
choose 2. The grade calculator will then convert all these numbers into your
final grade on 4.0 scale.
Q: The grade eval does not seem to be related to the course
material, so it's hard for me to take it seriously. What's the penalty for not
submitting a grade eval?
A: The grade eval is your opportunity to take responsibility for your successes
and possible failures in the class. In that sense, it is very much related to
the class. Not submitting the grade eval should be considered equivalent to not
taking an exam.
Q: I'm very hard on myself and I know some people will definitely
inflate their grades. Wouldn't that leave me at a relative disadvantage?
A: Deliberate grade inflation is a form of academic dishonesty and will not earn
brownie points with the instructor. On the other hand, those who demonstrate an
ability to be self-reflective will benefit by getting a high mark on this
particular assignment.
Q: How do I know if I'm posting correctly and if my grade
calculator numbers are similar to those of the instructor?
A: Although there
is certainly at least a small subjective component in any evaluation scheme,
those who follow the to-do list and rubric guidelines typically get full credit
for their posts. Students who go above and beyond may also earn some extra
credit. Things to avoid include excessive cut-and-paste, omission of a
reference, obvious indifference to basic research, etc. In the end, I will look
at the pattern of your submissions, compare these to those of the top students
in the class, and apply the online grading rubric.
Q: How often do we need to submit the grade eval?
A: Everyone needs to submit two grade evals--one early in the course and another
one at the end of the course. The purpose of the early grade eval is to give
students a better understand the grading process and motivate them take
responsibility for their own education. The final grade eval is essentially a portfolio of all your work.
Q: I have now finished module#1. What's my grade so far?
A: In this class, everything is graded on a rubric, not on
a growing collection of points. If you would like to estimate your
status in the class at any point in the class, you will need to work through the
grading rubric, generate some reasonable numbers based on the rubric, and then
plug them into the grade calculator to come up with an estimated grade in the
class. I'm happy to give students feedback after they have gone through this
exercise and demonstrated an understanding of the rubric. One
important aspect of this grading system is that a few blemishes on your
record do not drag down your grade, as long as the course-long patterns
are healthy. So perfectionism is never required, which hopefully reduces
potential stress and enhances the learning process.
Q: Does anyone else use this unusual grading system?
A: This
grading system is similar in spirit to the narrative evaluation system used at
Evergreen State College.
As you probably know, assigning grades is a difficult process that no teacher looks forward to. And although grading is certainly not an exact science, we can still strive to be as fair and as consistent as possible. To help with the process and to make sure that you receive every possible consideration, you will need to submit (in Canvas) an analysis of the grade you think you deserve based on the criteria discussed in the syllabus. Please use this calculator to estimate your grade or range of possible grades. You may play around with the weights (i.e., percentages of total grade) to nudge your grade a bit, but your estimate should always be based on rational arguments rather than on wishful thinking. Keep in mind that to have some standard and help you with objectivity, you will need to compare yourself to the strongest students in the class. Your estimate can only help you, never hurt you, especially if it demonstrates an ability to be self-reflective and objective. A sample analysis is provided below.
The grade calculator above should give you a grade which corresponds roughly to the following GPA scale:
4.0: Exceptional student
strong in every aspect of the class
strong contributor to learning community
passionate about learning
rarely/never complains about things being too hard
3.0: Pretty good student
strong in most aspects of the class, with some weaknesses
average contributor to learning community
credit for the class is probably more important than the learning process
2.0: Average student
weak in many areas but has a reasonable grasp of the important ideas
poor contributor to learning community
1.0: Barely-passing student
Serious issues with effort and motivation (or evidence thereof)
0.0: Little or no effort, virtually no motivation (or evidence thereof)
A reasonable estimate of your grade can be obtained using the excellent-good-poor scale for each component, with appropriate weighting factors. Excellent earns 3, good 2, poor 1. If you're not very good or very bad in a particular category, you're probably a 2. Since there is a subjective component in this approach, you'll need to use your judgment. The guidelines below should help you come up with reasonable numbers. In general, the subjective components that score higher are those that demonstrate a strong effort, positive attitude, and good self-reflection.
Meg O'Hetz is a student who gets 100% on the exams and homework but usually doesn't participate in discussions, does not engage in stargazing activities, writes shallow journals, and contributes little to the learning community. This student will end up with a grade in the neighborhood of 2.6 or less. So exams are not the whole story.
Nysa Neezie is a student who gets about average on the exams, struggles on the homework, but writes in-dept and self-reflective journals, consistently asks questions in class and engages in discussions, exhibits an enthusiasm for learning. This student will earn a grade in the neighborhood of 3.0 or better, which is not too shabby for an average test taker.
If you would like to estimate your status in the class at any point in the class, you will need to work through the grading rubric, generate some reasonable numbers based on the rubric, and then plug them into the grade calculator to come up with an estimated grade in the class. I'm happy to give students feedback after they have gone through this exercise and demonstrated an understanding of the rubric. This also happens to be a required exercise ('early progress report') due after the first week (see Calendar). In general, you get full credit for completing items in the weekly to-do list. Since most students who submit do a very good job (sometimes after some calibration), the only way to lose points on these items is not to submit and/or completely ignore feedback. This means that consistency and a good-faith effort, rather than perfection, are the keys to success in this class. The score you get for each component (e.g., articles) in the end will be roughly the average of all the weekly scores. For example, if you submitted articles and responses 80% of the time, your score for this component on the grade calculator will be 0.80*3+0.20*0=2.4 (out of 3). Make sure to submit a self-evaluation quiz at least once (early in this class) to get a feel for all the components.
Leadership/Attitude/Academic Maturity
3 -- excellent
outstanding contributor to the learning community
clearly one of the leaders in the class
clearly passionate about learning
one of the first to post introduction (in the Introductions forum)
consistently does more than the required minimum (in the to-do list)
consistently positive attitude and lots of enthusiasm
completely self-motivated and consistently fuels discussions
strong drive to learn and to motivate and educate others
consistently helpful to peers (answering questions, making suggestions, etc.)
highly introspective and honest grade eval submitted at the end of the course (similar to the examples below)
generally applies to only a handful of students in any given class
2 -- good
does all that is required, but not much more
often participates in but usually does not initiate discussions
usually does not tackle challenging discussion questions
usually stays away from controversial or provocative topics
stays "invisible" for a big portion of the class; typically, the reserved observer
most hard-working but quiet people will fall into this category
1 -- poor
rarely goes beyond the bare minimum and often does not even do that
very inconsistent and/or posts little substance (beyond short, one-liners)
may complain about some vague difficulty without actually asking specific questions
stays "invisible" for most of the class, particularly in general discussion
typically indifferent, with no real passion to get involved or to contribute to the learning community
shallow and/or excessively inflated grade eval submitted at the end of the course
slackers and procrastinators generally fall into this category
General participation:
3 -- excellent participation
more proactive than reactive
consistently contributes intelligence to the learning community
consistently helpful/responsive to peers
always follows up in discussions (not simply one post at a time)
does not disappear for extended periods of time
frequently initiates discussions and generally follows up
frequently responds to discussion topics, including DQ's by instructor
frequently poses questions to clarify or extend material
frequently takes stands and expresses opinions
communicates without excessive cut-and-paste
2 -- decent participation
sometimes contributes intelligence to the learning community
more reactive than proactive
often, but not always, follows up in discussions
posting, then disappearing for several days or more, and then replying would be considered a poor follow-up
sometimes responds to discussion questions; sometimes initiates
sometimes poses questions to clarify or extend material
sometimes takes stands and expresses opinions
some gaps in participation
1 -- poor participation
rarely contributes intelligence to the learning community
posts are consistently shallow or filled with excessive cut-and-paste
does not seem to pay attention to what others have posted
posts random factoids or factoid-oriented questions with no obvious intent to start a discussion
Example: What is the radius of the Earth?
rarely follows up
rarely poses questions to clarify or extend material
consistently poor effort answering questions in class/Forum ("Hmmm, I dunno...")
rarely takes stands and expresses opinions on any issue brought up in class
seems indifferent much of the time
3 -- excellent effort
consistently scores 90% or better
consistently starts the reading and quizzes comfortably (days) before the due date
hw-related journals and consistent contribution (e.g., questions, answers, etc.) to class discussions
embraces challenging topics
2 -- average effort
some procrastination
inconsistent contribution of quiz-related insight in class
some hw-related observations in the journals
1 -- poor effort
consistently less than 70% and/or 3 or more missed assignments
often procrastinates and rarely embraces challenging topics
rarely contributes quiz-related insights to class discussions
journals usually not related to class content
virtually no effort on DQ's throughout the course
Exams
3 -- upper third of the class
scores significantly above average
clear mastery of most of the material
2 -- middle third of the class
scores around average
decent though incomplete mastery of the material
1 -- bottom third of the class
scores significantly below average
serious gaps in understanding
Typically, a score 60-80% (depending on the average) on an exam translates to a 2/3 on the grade calculator. A score significantly above or below that translates to a 3/3 or 1/3, respectively.
*Note: Consistently solid participation and a substantive self-eval (similar to the examples below) submitted at the end of the course can make up for some weaknesses on the exams.
Stargazing:
3 -- consistently insightful and educational
observations typically include background information, mythology, relevant links, etc.
observations often include explanatory images or diagrams and actual photos when the sky is clear
consistently includes exploratory Q&A (at least 2)
not deterred by uncooperative weather, refers to software (e.g., Starry Night or stargazing apps) when necessary
consistently helpful/responsive to peers
does not disappear for extended periods of time
2 -- average consistency and/or insight
clearly not one of the class leaders
minimal or inconsistent effort to educate
some interesting observations, but usually with no passion
typically does what's required, but not more
sometimes disappears for days at a time
often uses cloudy weather as an excuse not to post anything of substance
1 -- consistently shallow observations
very few substantive observations
very little effort to educate others
examples of shallow observations include:
"The sky is pretty cloudy. Can't see much." with no effort to offer information on what one could have seen
"I think I saw some stars tonight." with no effort to name the stars
"Check out this beautiful picture!" with no explanation as to why the picture should be considered remarkable
Journals:
3 -- consistency and substance
regular analysis of progress/struggles in class
consistently discusses specific things learned
not timid about offering suggestions
frequently references activity in the forums
2 -- average depth and content analysis
typically no more than a sentence or two
sometimes discusses progress in class or specific issues with content
1 -- consistently shallow and/or inconsistent
rarely discusses class content
often one-liners, with little analysis
Examples of shallow entries include:
"Everything is cool. Nothing new to report."
"The book sucks. I don't understand anything."
"Had some pizza. It was great."
Note: Failure to submit a reasonable self-evaluation can drop the journal score by 1 unit.
Presentation (does not apply to online classes)
3 -- excellent
clear evidence of effort and time invested
went beyond class material
focused on important ideas, with little drag factor
consistently timely and meaningful feedback to peers, not simply 'You guys did great!"
2 -- decent job, characterized by some or all of the following:
mostly review of class material
some drag factor
some mumbling, some reliance on notes
ok (but not stellar) feedback to peers
1 -- poor, characterized by some or all of the following:
poor organization with no obvious big picture
excessive mumbling and poor eye contact, excessive reliance on notes
feedback is consistently shallow and/or late (e.g., not submitted right after each presentation)
*Grading is more lenient for the early presentations. Those who present near the very end are expected to deliver perfection and will be graded from that perspective.
Science articles
3 -- excellent articles and feedback
consistent submission of well-formatted articles (see syllabus)
interesting topics, sometime provocative and controversial
insightful questions and answers
consistently meaningful feedback to peers
clear effort to educate and learn from others
2 -- pretty good articles and responses
missed a week here and there
some feedback to peers
delivery steady but not exciting
1 -- poor articles
inconsistent delivery and/or poor formatting
examples of poor formatting include:
meaningless subject line
excessive cut and paste
no link/reference
uninteresting articles
little or no meaningful feedback to peers
obvious absence of enthusiasm
The key to a good self-evaluation is to be more critical of oneself than of others. Making excuses, rather than taking responsibility, tends to slow down the learning process. The following examples demonstrate excellent self-reflection and suggest that these students are ready to take the next step up.
"I deserve an A because my attendance was good and I tried really hard."
This evaluation does not specifically address grading criteria. It is simply an emotional response, with little depth or evidence of self-reflection, by a student who probably did very little in class and was not aware of the problem. His/her grade was significantly lower than his/her estimate.
"I believe I should earn at least a 3.0 because I did all my assignments on time and took the time to read the chapter and learn the subject on hand. I probably could have done better on the Discussion Board because some weeks I did not reply a lot and some I did. Being that this was my first online class, I feel confident that I did well even though Astronomy was a really tough subject for me. Also, I just finished the final and I feel really good about it. Overall, I enjoyed this course even though I struggled through some of it but I did manage to make it to the end and that's very important. Thanks and take care teach..."
This student, though good-natured, did not specifically address
the grading criteria. He received significantly less than his estimate.
"I believe that I deserve a grade of the range of around 2.7. After completing all of my assignments, my percentage was about 80%. This shows that I understood most of what we learned. Also, for almost every assignment, my score was above the class average which shows that my scores were above a lot of the people in the class. Even though I didn't join in the discussions as much as I wanted to, I feel that my assignment scores should prove that I actually learned. This class taught me a lot of new interesting things about the universe that I had never known before."
Again, this student used his gut feeling and did not specifically follow the rubric. He appears to focus mostly on homework points, which (according to the rubric) are not a significant component of the grade. On the other hand, stargazing and articles, which collectively are more important, are missing from his analysis.
Grade calculator: 2.7
Motivation/Leadership/Attitude: I tend to be a really shy person when it
comes to speaking up in class. Even though this class was online, I still had
trouble initiating discussions. I feel that I did participate in class as much
as I felt comfortable doing. I tried my best in answering my peers questions and
I tried to think of things to discuss with my peers as well. I felt that I
worked hard on my homework and other assignments. I did really enjoy learning
about the universe and all that it involves which I think gave me a good
attitude toward all the assignments. Overall, I think my participation in this
class could have been better, but I think that with my shyness I did the best
that I could. So for this section I thought that I'd give myself a 2.
Homework: In a lot of my homework assignments I ended up submitting them
on the day that they were due. But this doesn't mean that I procrastinated.
Taking the advice of others, I would print the questions, search for the answers
and then submit my answers later. I would try and work on at least 20-30
questions a day depending on how many questions were on the homework. I think
that I did extremely well on the homework considering how hard it seemed to be
at times. On the homework I would get about 70-80%. This made me really happy.
And usually I am the type of person to procrastinate (especially in online
classes), but I really tried to not do that this quarter and I think that I did
a really good job! So for the homework section I gave myself a 3.
Exams: Before the midterm I really made sure that I studied as much as I
could. I was hoping that I would get at least a 70%, but instead I scored a 58%,
which was the average for the class. I was a little bummed at first but then I
realized that I studied as much as I could and there was nothing else I could've
done to help me do better. Hopefully I will do a little better on the final. I'm
going to set a goal for myself of getting in the average score of the class
again. For both the final and midterm section, I gave myself a 2.
Stargazing: With the weather this quarter it was really hard to stargaze.
Even though this was the case, I made the best of it and used programs like
Starry Night and the Sky & Telescope Interactive Sky Chart. I always tried to
find new constellations and things that I haven't seen or posted about before. I
also always tried to give background information or the history of the
constellation. At first stargazing was a little hard and I felt like I didn't
know what I was looking at. But now I feel that I can look at the sky and
actually see things and name them. Comparing myself to others in the class, I
still feel that I don't know as much as much or understand as much as them. So
because of this I gave myself a score of 2.5.
Journals: Starting this quarter I posted three journals each week. After
that it was kind of hard for me to post three each week, so I started posting
just two each week. I still felt that I was thorough and honest about my
progress in the class and I felt that two posts a week was good to explain
everything. I really liked posting journals because it was a way to express your
thoughts and maybe even concerns. I gave myself a score of 3.
General Participation: I really enjoyed taking this class and I felt that
I contributed as much as I could. I invested a lot of my time into studying and
preparing for this class. Online classes can be hard to get motivated, but since
this class was really interesting, I was able to spend more time on it. I think
overall in this class I did a good job, but I think that i could have pushed
myself to participate a little more. So because what I could've pushed myself to
do, I gave myself a 2 in this section.
Science Articles: I really enjoyed posting articles on different subjects
and reading about the articles that others posted. I think it was nice to be
able to pick an article on any topic, even though a lot of people still tried to
keep them science related. I thought that these articles were a really good way
to learn about new technologies and new things in general. I think that for this
section I earned a 3 because I always posted articles each week and I made sure
to respond and ask questions about other student's articles as well.
This student demonstrates character and excellent self-reflection by being tough on herself, avoiding grade inflation, and not coming up with excuses. She was rewarded with a grade significantly higher than her calculation.
Grade calculator: 1.4
First, I think this has been the most challenging class I have
ever taken, more so than math! The good thing about this class is as much work
as it was, when I have a moment to sit down (now that the quarter is over) and
really digest the information, more things will come to mind and I will look it
up and continue to learn more about astronomy! Now to the grading:
Midterm: I did it on time and finished all of the questions. I put effort and
time into it. I didn't do very well (I really thought I would have done better),
so I gave myself a 1.
Final: This was HARD, I know I did not do well at all and the short answer questions were baffling. I did not cheat and look things up, I did what I could with what I knew at the time so I gave myself a 1.
Homework: I saw that I had two holes in my homework. I swear
that I did them, but the computer does not lie, so I am missing two. I tried my
hardest even though I did not keep up with the crowd. Because I put effort into
it and tried, I gave myself a 1.
Journal: I did many journals, probably not as much as others, but I did put
thought into what I was writing and trying to "check in" with you. I feel I did
a pretty good job with the journals so I gave myself a 2.
Stargazing: I did a lot of stargazing and stayed away from "It's cloudy outside and there are no stars!!!" I put thought into what I was doing. Stargazing was difficult for a beginner to do because I was always second guessing myself, and it seemed almost embarrassing because most other people seemed to know more than me, so I gave myself a 2.
Articles: I feel that this is my strongest area because I did a lot of them and felt I did them right. These were also the most fun part of the class for me because just about anything goes! I feel that this can show off your personality, by what you choose. Some days I was going to post but did not find one that suited me. I think looking up articles will be one thing I keep doing to keep up on current events!! I gave myself a 3.
Participation: I did participate by answering some of the DQ's and responding to others in the forum. I also responded to others in the articles and stargazing areas as well. I did not do as much as I should have done because I felt like I was late when a bunch of people had already answered, but that is my problem :( But overall, I feel that I did okay, so I gave myself a 2.
Motovation/leadership: I'm not saying I am lazy, but I always
felt like I didn't really have anything smart to post, like an insightful
question. So I never really posted anything of my own in the general
discussion--well, maybe a couple of times. I have been motivated, though,
because I have been here and reading/responding to others and taking a bite out
of some of the DQ's. So I only gave myself a 1.
The grade calculator came up with a 1.4. Although I got low scores, I have tried
to do well throughout the quarter, I feel that somewhere in this range is fair
for my final grade. What do you think?
This eval again demonstrates excellent self-reflection and understanding of the learning objectives. This student received a significantly higher grade than he calculated because of his honesty, good attitude, and an excellent effort on some of the course components (e.g., articles).
Grade calculator: 1.8
Midterm--1. I did not do as well on the mid term as I thought I should have.
Although I studied the material, I do not feel that I put enough time in
learning what I studied, and it reflected on my score.
Final--2. Although I have not taken the final yet (mostly because of technical
errors) I know how much work I put into getting ready for it and feel I will do
well!
Homework--2. On many of the homework assignments I gave it multiple attempts to
get as high a score as I could. I know that much of what I read, I could
comprehend and used it outside of class when the opportunity presented itself. I
think towards the end of the quarter my research skills improved and my quiz
scores did as well.
Journal--2. This score could have been better with a little more motivation on
my part. Although writing about what I am doing or trying to do is a weakness of
mine, this was an opportune time to strengthen that weakness and I didn't do
that well enough.
Stargazing 2. I am not sure whether to put this score lower or higher. I tried
many nights to find Andromeda and some of the other more difficult
constellations and objects in the sky. I didn't, however, articulate that in the
forum very well. I think when I did though, it inspired others to look for them
also and started a dialogue on what we discovered.
Articles--3. I think this area was my strongest overall. I presented an article
every week and I tried, I believe successfully, to find an article that
corresponded with what we were studying during that week. Many of my articles
received multiple replies from my classmates as well.
Group Presentations--2. Although we didn't give a group presentation, I had to
put a number there in the rubix. I chose 2 because I feel I contributed to the
class as a whole with interesting articles, responses to other articles, and
thought provoking arguments at times.
Motivation/Leadership--2. I think my motivation should have been better in the
stargazing forum. I think with a bit more effort in that genre, I could have
contributed to others' learning as well as my own. I think at times my
leadership in answering or trying to answer general discussion questions was
adequate. I answered a few of them correctly and read others' answers and found
out information which helped me as well.
Overall, I found this class to be demanding, but fair. I think the syllabus
covered everything well enough to give the students a good understanding of what
was expected and how to achieve the best grade possible. I really enjoyed taking
this course and will take from it much more information and knowledge about our
universe than I had before this journey. However, I must give myself a grade on
the low end of the scale if I am to be honest in my evaluation. The grade
calculator graded it to be 1.8. I concur with that assessment!
This student demonstrates academic maturity and a hard-work ethic and set an excellent example in the class. He/she received significantly higher than his/her calculated grade.
Wow, asking a student what grade they think they should get, different, but good. To be quite honest, I think my grade should be somewhere between a 2.6 and a 2.8, here is my reasoning:
1. Midterm - there is no denying that I did not do as well as most of the class, nor as well as I hoped to do, but I did my best and the only resource I used was my “noodle” (as my niece calls it). My total score was below the class average, but as you said in your post a score in the mid 20's to low 30's is a 2; therefore, I gave myself a 2.
2. Final - we have not taken it yet, but I had to put a grade, so I gave myself a 2. I figure, if I study hard, participate, and review past posts I should do fine.
3. Homework - My homework scores have consistently been above the class average and roughly, in the mid 70's to low/mid 80's (percentage); therefore, I gave myself a 3.
4. Journal - This is one of the hardest things for me to do, but I think I have done a good job thus far; therefore, I gave myself a 2.3.
5. Stargazing - I think I have been consistent with my stargazing. I have been out looking at the sky and if I am unable to view any stars I have researched stars and constellations for the benefit of the class; therefore, I gave myself a 2.5.
6. Articles - I have consistently provided well written and interesting science articles - most concerning astronomy and have provided feed back to others in the class and tried to engage in dialogue with others regarding their articles; therefore, I gave myself a 3.
7. General Participation - This is not an excuse, just the facts. Considering that, I work full time and my commute from Fife to Seattle takes me away from my capture for about 12 hours each day (M-F), I think I have participated pretty well. I know others have posted hundreds of posts over the course of the quarter thus far, and some of those posts were worthless rants about how they liked the chapter, or why your syllabus was 19 pages. I find these posts to be useless and frankly, a waste of time; therefore, I did not post such thoughts. I would think you would be more interested in quality not quantity. I feel my posts were well thought out and provided information to all who read them; therefore, I gave myself a 2.5. You will note that I only gave myself a 2.5 because there were some in the class who really participated and definitely deserve a 3, I did my best with the time I had and feel my best is worthy of a 2.5.
8. Motivation/Leadership - I didn't always lead and I didn't always follow but I think I did both and I think I did them pretty well. I was very motivated in this class. I read each chapter (sometimes 2-3 times) and I stargazed, pulled interactive star charts, researched stars and constellations for the benefit of the class, and provided weekly articles that were interesting and thought provoking, therefore, I gave myself a 1.5. I think the top grades in each category are reserved for the students who exhibited exemplary work and participation. I did my best and think I earned the two 3’s I gave myself and the other grades as well. When calculated using the grading calculator I get a 2.7. I think for this class that’s a pretty darn good grade, considering math and science have always been a challenge for me! Of course, this is just my view of how I think I did this quarter, and will respect whatever grade you ultimately give me, as I am sure you will give me the grade you think I have earned. Thank you.
Grade calculator: 3.2 GPA
Participation: I feel that I did a really good job here because I was always
responding to things and asking questions. I think it is important and hard to
show participation on an online class because you are not there to have the
teacher listen to you. I tried really hard to demonstrate my knowledge in all
the assignments and asked questions to better my self and gain knowledge. I am
really interested in astronomy which is why I believe I participated so much.
Homework: Although it will appear that I turned in my assignments shortly before
the deadline, I was prepared a great deal of time before I submitted them. Home
work was one of the things that I really worked hard at because it was a lot of
work. I saved my answers on the computer in days prior to the assignments being
due so that I can go through and correct them without wasting my submissions. I
tried a lot of the time not to use any other sources other than my book on the
homework to challenge myself and I feel I learn better that way. Although I
never got all the answers right on all the homework’s, but I know I still
learned a great deal.
Exams: Prior to both the midterm and the final, I studied for weeks to prepare.
I really wanted to do well on these assignments because I have always had a lot
of pressure put on me in the past for them. I know I am not the best test taker
because I really don’t like the pressure, I get all caught up and frustrated
that I get off track from focuses. This quarter I thought I did exceptionally
well and I think that had a lot to do with studying and preparing myself better.
I wish I would have done better on my exams but overall I am happy with the
knowledge I learned and the success I made. I know I did a lot better on my
Final then the Mid-term. However, I do not feel that either reflects what I
really know and have learned throughout the quarter.
Articles: This was a part of the class I really enjoyed. I really had a fun time
reading articles that I chose and ones that others had picked. My favorite part
overall I think was picking any topic I wanted. Although it was nice to read
some involving astronomy, it was neat to take a little break and discuss some
other things with the class. I thought this was a good way to participate in the
class and I liked learning about my classmates.
Stargazing: This was definitely another part of the class I had a lot of fun
doing. My only regret is taking this class in a quarter where the weather was
going to be so bad. I love to look at the stars because I think it is so
beautiful and amazing. I really enjoyed taking this class because I learned
about those stars and other things in the sky. Now I have the most fun looking
at the stars with friends and being able to tell them what those things are and
show off my new knowledge. It was really a lot of fun!
Journals: I have never been one to write journals or reflect things down on
paper, but it was really nice to do so. I like getting everything out and
getting an understanding of the way I feel. I think it was a helpful tool and
let us write down anything that we wanted to write down.
Motivation/Leadership: I think that my motivation could have been better than it
was. I do feel that I did well and participated a great deal but I could have
encouraged other to participate just as much. I think this was a challenge being
in an online class because you don’t get to present yourself to the class, or
see any of your classmates. I know I could have motivated better and lead better
if I had been in an actual classroom with my classmates.
Overall: I really enjoyed taking this class and have no regrets. I found this
class to be demanding… but fair. The grade calculator gave me a 3.2 and I really
feel that is what I deserved. I feel that my only downfall would be my scores on
the exams but I feel that is because I am a bad test taker. I really did
participate a whole lot and got every assignment in on time. This was a great
class where I gained a lot of new knowledge and I am excited to go show that
off!
The Grade Calculator came up with 3.2.
Midterm: For the midterm I gave myself a 2 because I was average in the class, which I am happy with being, I wish I did a little better, but even though my midterm score does not reflect it I tried hard and learned a lot! I went over the chapters and skimmed them before the midterm and looked over the homework, I felt I was as ready as I could be so I did my best.
Final: I have not taken the final yet but I gave myself a 3 because I am going to really try hard to improve my grade from the midterm, and I want to get an above average score. I think I can do it. I understand the chapters very well, and I will continue to go over them to improve my chances for this goal.
Homework: I did very good with the homework. I always turned it in before it was due, and my scores were average or a little above so I gave myself a 3. I am confident with my scoring because I know I always tried hard to get the right answers out of the book, and I made sure it was always submitted before it was due. I could not find every answer nor did I learn everything in the book that I read, but the things I did understand will now make me a smarter and more experienced person, and I am glad I can take away a lot more new information I never knew before.
Journal: I turned in my journal twice every single week like the assignment said to. I never missed one, and made sure to always right down my feelings for the week. I put a 3 for this. I think I could of done a little better and maybe expressed my feelings a little more. I will try to do this in future online classes, this was my first class, but that is not an excuse because the assignment was very clear. Overall on the journals though I think I had good effort.
Stargazing: This part of the class, was a little more difficult for me. At first I did not quite get the star chart. I then figured it out though. I turned in 2 stargazing sessions every week, and never missed any weeks. I gave my self a 3 for being on top of my assignments. I made sure that even if it was cloudy I would still do some work, so I used starry night a lot to make sure I was active in the stargazing forum. I tried to share information about what I had found to help the class learn as well.
Articles: the articles was a fun part of the class. I liked seeing all the different articles people came up with. Some would even post articles that did not really have to do with science which I thought was amusing. I turned in an articles every week, and responded to other articles along the way. I gave myself a 3 for this. I always tried to find an article that would directly relate to astronomy and I had good effort in that. Overall I think this was a good exercise to get students to participate and have fun.
General Participation: This is the area where I was weakest at. I could have been more active in here. I always made sure to post atleast twice a week in the general discussion, which was what was assigned, but I still think I could of had more conversation with the other students. I give myself a 2 in this category, because I could of have more effort thrown this way. Next online class I am going to make sure to try harder on this aspect.
Motivation/Leadership: For this part I think I did an average job, so I will give myself a 2. I once in awhile would have a good question or comment that popped in my head and I would post it. I also tried to answer a few DQ's. But I think I could have done more to earn a 3. I am disappointed that I did not try harder for this part and for the general participation. I think these are actually the easiest parts of the class to do well in because all you have to do is show an interest and presence in the conversations. I will definitely try to improve the quality of me.
Overall, I think the grade calculator gave me a fair number. I did not put in a 4.0 effort, so I do not deserve that, the 3.2 that it gave me seems very fair to me, because I did all my work with good effort, but there was room for some more effort. This class has broadened my skills of online classes since it is my first, and it was challenging, but I enjoyed it as well!
Grade calculator: 4.0 GPA
Exams: I studied extensively for the midterm and for the final. On the midterm
I scored 83% and on the final I also scored 83%. The average score according to
Canvas is in the high 50 percentile region for both of those tests, so
statistically it seems very likely I scored in the upper third on the class.
Homework: I did every single homework assignment and usually averaged around 95%
on them. I have little doubt this places me at least in the top third of the
class, and probably significantly higher than that. I never had any homework
related questions, but if I saw someone post a question that I had a good answer
for I would answer it without hesitation. I never procrastinated. I generally
started and finished the homework within a 90 minute time frame.
Journals: I wrote in depth journals at least twice a week every week detailing
my progress in the course, and letting you know any feedback or ideas I had that
I thought you might find to be of interest. I felt like you would have a good
idea of where I was in the class at any given time by reading my journal
entries.
Stargazing: I made sure to stargaze at least two times a week every week except
one where I was unable to get out for several consecutive nights. On that
particular instance I stargazed 4 times on the following week to make up for
lost time. I tried to provide interesting factoids about my observations when
possible, and when the weather was uncooperative I tried to explain what my
plans were to have been. I frequently used the software to plan in advance and
never disappeared for an extended period of time.
Articles: I posted an article every week and read through and responded to the
articles of two other students that I found to be of interest. They were always
in the proper format, of interesting subject matter and explored the material in
a way as to draw others into what I had found so interesting about them. I
tried to be provocative in my responses to others.
Participation: I posted both early and often, while frequently starting
interesting discussions. My thought provoking questions certainly seemed to
provoke others to think and when others posted interesting queries I didn't
hesitate to respond to them. I never failed to express my opinion about any
relevant subject I had an opinion on, and I didn't cut a paste anything.
Motivation/Leadership: I posted several times a week in the general forum, and
attempted to lead and to motivate others through my posts into giving me
interesting responses. Others frequently responded to me and I felt like I
helped a lot in drawing others into interesting conversations. It was easy to
stay highly motivated during the entire class given how interesting the subject
matter was.
General: I really enjoyed this class and I felt like this contributed greatly to
how willing I was to invest more time into it. Usually with online classes I've
found myself putting in minimal effort, but this one was different and drove me
to study harder. This was predominantly a characteristic of how interesting the
subject matter was. I think I did an excellent job overall in this class, and it
seems to me to be a find way to end my community college career before moving on
to a four year university. I believe I earned a 4.0 in this class due to
outstanding achievement in all of the areas of the class.
This student demonstrated a passion for learning throughout the quarter, was a leader in most aspects of the class, and finished off with an excellent grade eval, clearly worthy of a 4.0.
I gave myself all 3s, so the grade calculator gave me a 4.0
Here’s my reasoning for that grade.
Midterm—From your standards (5 or more above average = 3), I got a 3 on the midterm. I felt very apprehensive about it, because I hadn’t been reading all of the lecture notes. But when I read how others in the class were studying, I knew I had to work harder. I read through all the lecture notes—most of them several times—and reviewed key points from the chapters. I did not use my book or any other outside sources, but was pleasantly surprised to find that as I read the questions on the test, I knew most of the answers. My score demonstrates the hard work I put in after some low scores at the beginning of the quarter.
Final—I gave myself a 3 for the final because I’m consistently spending more time studying now than I did before the midterm. I’m learning a lot, and I know most of the information is sticking, because I’ve been able to answer some of the other students’ questions on the discussion boards.
Homework—The very first homework assignment was a bit shocking. I’m a 4.0 student for the second year in a row here at Highline, but I’ve never taken an online class. I scored significantly below average on that first assignment. Lots of my earlier journal entries show the horror and discouragement I was feeling from missing lots of questions on the homework. However, I have changed my study habits significantly, mostly through trial and error. I’ve spent more time figuring out how to study for this class than any other class at Highline, but it’s paid off. On every homework assignment except the first one I have scored significantly higher than the class average. For the most part, every week I would miss fewer questions. My scores on the homework show how I have applied myself in an effort to redeem my poor performance that first week. I applied the advice in the syllabus about perfectionism and procrastination, and the result is a homework grade I am proud of.
Journal—I gave myself a 3 for journal. I posted twice almost every week (I think there were one or two weeks where I posted more or less). Yes, there were a few stressed-out posts that may have sounded whiny. Yes, there were posts I forgot to put the date on. I apologize for both of those things. They were the downfall of my early journals. But, as I have previously said, this quarter was all about learning, and not just about astronomy. My journals became more positive (and had dates at the top, just like the syllabus said) as the quarter went on.
Stargazing—The stargazing definitely scared me the most about this course. It’s the first week of the quarter, the middle of winter, raining or cloudy every night, and I remember thinking, “How can this possibly work?” But, the syllabus said we could post about other aspects of the weather if we couldn’t see the stars. There were a few weeks when I had to do that, but for the most part I braved the cold to observe constellations. I learned so much from watching the stars—it became my favorite aspect of class. I can point out constellations to my friends. I can’t wait for summer to spend time stargazing without having my face get numb from the cold! I didn’t post more than twice each week because honestly, stargazing posts tended to be the most redundant. But I did try to make my posts helpful to other students—asking questions, giving tips on what’s visible, and posting links to helpful sites. When other students posted with those things, I enjoyed it much more than the typical “I found _______ constellation.” or, “It was cloudy again.”
Presentation/articles—I posted an article every week except one (I believe), and the following week I posted several. I read a lot of other people’s articles and tried to comment with more than “That was interesting.” I tried to ask questions whenever I could.
General Participation—As with my other categories, I’ve shown improvement in general participation. It took me a couple of weeks to figure out the general forum—what to post, how often, etc. Once I started reading the chapters earlier and earlier in the week, however, I found it was a great place to interact with the other students. Classroom interaction is difficult to replace in an online class, but the forum was surprisingly helpful. I posted some links I had found helpful, answered some questions, and posted questions. Toward the end of the quarter, I tried to be more creative with my questions so the class would enjoy them as well as learning from them.
Motivation/leadership—As evident from the other categories, I have learned a lot
from this class. My motivation has steadily improved
from the beginning of the quarter (and I was excited to begin with).
Even my early posts were usually enthusiastic about my discoveries, and
they have progressed from there. As far as
leadership goes, I have done my best to post things that make other students
think. I have tried to discuss topics with them when
I comment, and to prompt their discussions when I post my own entries.
This is what I would want from other students in the class.
The students who posted like this are the ones I see as leaders.
They are the ones who help me learn, who urge me to think more deeply
about the topics we’re covering. I feel that I have
been one of these students, one who tries to urge her fellow students to enjoy
the class and think at a more critical level.
This student was a pleasure to have in class, no doubt had a very positive influence on peers, and has clearly discovered the secret to being happy in life--a passion for learning and growing.
Grade Calculator: 2.9